Key result
COVID-19 myocarditis shows no significant CMR or functional differences compared to nonspecific viral myocarditis.
Why the study?
The differentiation between COVID-19-associated myocarditis and nonspecific viral myocarditis using clinical, laboratory, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings was unclear.
Observational (n=66)
No
p-value: p=0.027
Similar CMR, echo, and lab findings in COVID-19 and NSVM myocarditis support no acute management change; leaves open distinct phenotypes or prognostic differences.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare laboratory, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) findings in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) associated myocarditis and nonspecific viral myocarditis (NSVM).METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 25 patients who were considered to have COVID-19-associated myocarditis according to the Lake-Louise criteria and clinical findings. We retrospectively evaluated 41 patients who were accepted as NSVM according to the Lake Louse criteria between January 2016 and March 2020. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), ejection fraction, stroke volume, peak ejection rate, and cardiac index data were analyzed for two groups. Echocardiography findings and clinical data were evaluated. Comparisons were made one-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test.RESULTS: LGE was detected in 25 (30%) patients with COVID-19 through CMR examination. LGE was detected most frequently in the inferior segments (mean 2.8 segments) in the patients. Pericardial thickening was observed in 8 (32%) patients. In the NSVM patients, LGE was observed only in the inferior segments in 25 patients, in the lateral–inferior segments in 10 patients, and the septal–inferior segments in 6 patients (mean of 2.4 segments). Pericardial thickening was present in 14 (34%) patients. T2 hyperintensity was not observed. Echocardiography findings were within normal limits in myocarditis groups. There was no statistically significant difference between myocarditis groups' CMR functional data (p = 0.027).CONCLUSION: Functional heart parameters and laboratory findings were similar and normal limits, and no significant difference was observed in imaging features and functional data between NSVM and COVID-19-associated myocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altay et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Myocarditis (COVID-19-associated vs Nonspecific viral) (n=66). COVID-19-associated myocarditis vs. Nonspecific viral myocarditis (NSVM) was evaluated on Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) functional data and imaging features (p=0.027). There were no significant differences in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging features, laboratory findings, or functional heart data between COVID-19-associated myocarditis and nonspecific viral myocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: