Key result
Higher serum cathepsin D correlates with increased carotid intima-media thickness in hemodialysis patients.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in hemodialysis patients, and cathepsin D has been suggested as a potential marker of atherosclerosis in this population.
Cross-Sectional (n=31)
p-value: p=<0.05
Hypothesis-generating in hemodialysis; prospective studies needed before considering cathepsin D as a vascular biomarker.
AIM: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in hemodialysis (HD) patients, and approximately half of mortalities in HD patients are attributed to CV disease. Atherosclerosis is the most frequent cause of CV complications in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Based on recent studies, cathepsin D has been suggested as a potential marker of atherosclerosis, and we hypothesized that there is an association between serum concentration of cathepsin D and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Thirty-one hemodialysis patients (18 men and 13 women) were enrolled in this study. Serum levels of soluble cathepsin D were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) kit. CIMT was determined in each patient. RESULTS: The data showed that there was a positive significant correlation between serum concentration of cathepsin D and CIMT by using Pearson correlation (P value <0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, cathepsin D could be suggested to have a role in the development of atherosclerotic plaques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moallem et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Hemodialysis (n=31). Serum concentration of cathepsin D was evaluated on Correlation between serum concentration of cathepsin D and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) (p=<0.05). Serum concentration of cathepsin D showed a positive significant correlation with carotid intima-media thickness in hemodialysis patients (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: