Key result
Age, rather than parity, drives elevated blood pressure risk in women.
Why the study?
The possible effect of pregnancy on elevated blood pressure levels and increased incidence of hypertension has been elusive to quantify and evaluate despite its epidemiological importance.
Pregnancy's link to hypertension remains hard to quantify; leaves open whether it causally affects long-term BP in observational data.
Among the many physiological factors which have been hypothesized as associated with elevated blood pressure levels and increased incidence of hypertension, the possible effect of pregnancy in the production of these conditions has proven to be among the more elusive to quantitate and evaluate. At the same time, the possible association is among the more interesting from an epidemiological standpoint, not only because of the importance of the primal question of whether or not pregnancy is a factor in the etiology of hypertension, but also because of the component parts represented by those pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. Age is considered by many observers to be an important factor in the production of residual hypertension, and the statistical association of age with increased blood pressure levels is probably the most pronounced and easily demonstrated phenomenon observable in any study population. A moderate decline in average diastolic blood pressure among the general population after age 55 is an exception to this, and is less frequently evaluated. Body measurements, race, and several other variables may be cited as also being correlated with blood pressure levels, however, their effect is much less significant than that observable for age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leslie G. Quinlivan (1973) conducted a review in Hypertension. Parity was evaluated. Parity and its potential association with hypertension remains elusive to evaluate, with age identified as a much more pronounced and easily demonstrated factor in elevated blood pressure levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: