Key result
IVL achieves ~92% device success for resistant calcified stent underexpansion without in-hospital MACE.
Why the study?
Stent underexpansion increases cardiac adverse event risk and limited treatment options exist for refractory stent underexpansion due to heavy calcification.
Observational (n=70)
Yes
May support IVL for refractory stent underexpansion; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion increases the risk of cardiac adverse events. At present, there are limited options to treat refractory stent underexpansion. In this context, the intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) system might be a safe and effective strategy. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IVL in addressing resistant stent underexpansion due to heavy underlying calcification. METHODS: This was an international multicentre registry including patients receiving IVL therapy to treat stent underexpansion from December 2017 to August 2020. Angiographic and intracoronary imaging data were collected. The efficacy endpoint was device success (technical success with a final percentage diameter stenosis <50%). The safety endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, the mean age was 73±9.2 years and 76% were male. The median time from stent implantation to IVL therapy was 49 days (0-2,537). Adjuvant treatment with non-compliant balloon dilatations pre- and post-IVL was performed in 72.3% and 76.8% of patients, respectively, and additional stenting was performed in 22.4%. Device success was 92.3%. Minimum lumen diameter increased from 1.49±0.73 mm to 2.41±0.67 mm (p<0.001) and stent expansion increased by 124.93±138.19% (p=0.016). No IVL-related procedural complications or MACE were observed. The use of bailout IVL therapy directly after stenting and the presence of ostial underexpanded lesions negatively predicted lumen diameter gain. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary lithotripsy is safe and effective in increasing lumen and stent dimensions in underexpanded stents secondary to heavily calcified lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forero et al. (2022) conducted an observational in resistant stent underexpansion due to heavy underlying calcification (n=70). Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) was evaluated on Device success (technical success with a final percentage diameter stenosis <50%). Intravascular lithotripsy for resistant stent underexpansion due to heavy calcification achieved a 92.3% device success rate with no procedure-related complications or in-hospital MACE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: