Reliable density estimation of liquid mixtures is essential for fuel engineering, process design, and quality control in the petroleum and chemical industries. This work compares eight machine learning approaches — SVR with RBF kernel, Random Forest, XGBoost, MLP, KNN, Decision Tree, a deep neural network, and a convolutional neural network — for predicting the density of binary n-alkane (C₉–C₁₆)/n-alkylcyclohexane (methyl- through dodecyl-, including selected branched isomers) mixtures. A dataset of 3,970 samples with four features (temperature, alkane carbon number, solute carbon number (R), and mole fraction) was assembled from published experimental studies, with hyperparameters tuned via 5-fold grid search. XGBoost achieved the best performance (test R² = 0.9980, RMSE = 1.0634 kg/m³, MAE = 0.6302 kg/m³), followed by SVR-RBF (R² = 0.9956, RMSE = 1.5737 kg/m³), Random Forest (R² = 0.9894, RMSE = 2.4307 kg/m³), and MLP (R² = 0.9875, RMSE = 2.6431 kg/m³). 10-fold cross-validation confirmed XGBoost's robustness (mean R² = 0.9969 ± 0.0011), with a bootstrap 95% confidence interval of [0.9968, 0.9989] for test R². Permutation importance identified mole fraction (0.8598) and temperature (0.6018) as the dominant predictors, with alkane carbon number contributing least (0.2252). Leave-one-alkane-out validation demonstrated robust generalization (mean R² = 0.9423), except for n-hexadecane (R² = 0.7682), while leave-one-R-out validation showed weakest performance for R=1 (R² = 0.6345). These findings can facilitate the development of accurate surrogate fuel formulations and provide a reliable data-driven framework for density estimation within the validated chemical space (n-alkanes C₉–C₁₆, n-alkylcyclohexanes with R = 1–12 and selected branched isomers, T = 288.15–373.15 K, and 0.1 MPa).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadegh Sahraei (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: