Reducing dependence on mineral fertilizers requires integrated nutrient management (INM) strategies that sustain maize productivity while improving soil functioning. A field experiment evaluated nine combinations of mineral NPK, farmyard manure, vermicompost, and Azotobacter - Bacillus inoculation in a randomized block design with three replications. The 75% NPK treatments integrated with either FYM or vermicompost and inoculation formed the leading treatment group. T7 (75% NPK + 5 t vermicompost ha⁻¹ + Azotobacter – Bacillus ) recorded the highest observed grain yield (40.8 q ha⁻¹), stover yield (62.5 q ha⁻¹), and total N, P, and K uptake (121.0, 31.3, and 92.2 kg ha⁻¹, respectively), but these responses did not differ significantly from T6. Microbial biomass carbon and dehydrogenase activity were also highest under T7 (112 mg kg⁻¹ and 4.4 µg TPF g⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively) and remained statistically comparable with T6. Available soil K was the only variable across nutrient uptake, soil fertility, micronutrient availability, and biological activity that differed significantly between T7 and T6. Relative to sole 100% NPK, T7 increased microbial biomass carbon by 32.9% and dehydrogenase activity by 51.7%. T7 generated gross returns of ₹99,340 ha⁻¹ (US$1,263.79 ha⁻¹), net returns of ₹59,722 ha⁻¹ (US$759.78 ha⁻¹), and economic efficiency of ₹567.66 ha⁻¹ day⁻¹ (US$7.22 ha⁻¹ day⁻¹). Principal component analysis associated the 75% NPK-based treatments with greater water-holding capacity, soil organic carbon, nutrient availability, and microbial activity. Thus, the complete 75% NPK-based organic-biological treatment packages provided effective fertilizer-saving options under the tested conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: