Key result
Cardiometabolic medicine drives integrated multidisciplinary care to overcome current cardiovascular healthcare silos.
Why the study?
The shift from organ-based cardiovascular disease management to integrated cardiometabolic medicine requires synthesis of evidence and identification of implementation challenges in China.
Highlights the strategic priorities and implementation barriers for transitioning to integrated cardiometabolic medicine in China to address the bidirectional interplay between metabolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease.
The development of cardiometabolic medicine (CMM) reflects a shift in cardiovascular disease (CVD) management from organ-based care toward greater cross-system integration. CMM integrates cardiovascular, endocrine, renal, and public health domains to address the bidirectional interplay between metabolic dysfunction and CVD. In this review, we trace the conceptual evolution from metabolic syndrome to cardiometabolic disease (CMD), synthesize evidence for the biological integration of cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal disease, individual cardiometabolic therapies, and emerging integrated care models, and discuss the epidemiological transition and implementation barriers in China, including service fragmentation, specialty silos, and limited patient engagement. Strategic priorities include a coordinated CMM framework, multidisciplinary care, standardized training, primary-tertiary care linkage, and digital implementation, together with measurable indicators for implementation and outcomes. China’s experience may offer relevant lessons for other Asian settings navigating similar transitions, suggesting that CMM may be viewed not simply as a new organizational construct, but as a potential realignment of chronic disease management toward integrated, patient-centered, and life-course cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiometabolic disease. Cardiometabolic medicine represents a shift toward integrated cardiovascular health management, requiring multidisciplinary care and coordinated frameworks to overcome current healthcare silos.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: