Key result
Resident-led remote BP monitoring reduces systolic BP by ~11 mmHg in rural Medicare patients.
Why the study?
Feasibility of implementing a remote blood pressure monitoring program in rural resident primary care clinics was evaluated.
Does a resident-led remote blood pressure monitoring program improve blood pressure control in Medicare populations with hypertension in rural settings?
Does a resident-led remote blood pressure monitoring program improve blood pressure control in Medicare populations with hypertension in rural settings?
Mean Difference: 11.4
p-value: p=<0.01
A resident-led remote blood pressure monitoring program is feasible and effectively improves blood pressure reduction and control in rural primary care settings.
May support remote BP monitoring in rural Medicare patients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated feasibility of implementing remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring (RBPM) program in rural resident primary care clinic. METHODS: This is Internal Medicine resident physicians-led single arm RBPM study among Medicare populations with hypertension in rural United States. Resident physicians provided a comprehensive self-management support (SS) and home BP guided pharmacotherapy over 6 months in collaboration with a third-party vendor. Our primary outcomes were changes between the first and the last 2 weeks of BP and its control (<130/80). Secondary outcomes were trend in home BP monitoring (HBPM), medication changes, progression towards patients' set SS goals and emergency room (ER) visits/hospitalization. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients provided 6 months of HBPM; 75% were White patients, 61.1% female and 81.9% from rural areas. They provided a mean (SD) of 7.3 (0.5) HBPM readings/week/patient that was stable over the study period. Mean (SD) BP difference and BP control were 11.4 (11.7)/3.4 (6.5) mmHg and 37.5% (all P < 0.01), respectively. One hundred and fifty-nine SS goals were set (66% either achieved or had progress made), 63.9% had medications changes. Twenty-four patients had ER visits; 16 were hospitalized, among them 4 ER visits were likely related to hypertension or anti-hypertensive medications which improved with medication changes. There were significant reductions in body mass index, cholesterol levels and glycated hemoglobin at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Resident-led RBPM program is feasible and associated with significant BP reduction. Future studies should consider program evaluation to inform context-driven implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2026) studied Hypertension (n=72). Remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM) and self-management support was evaluated on Changes between the first and the last 2 weeks of BP and its control (<130/80 mmHg) (Mean BP difference 11.4/3.4 mmHg, p=<0.01). A 6-month resident-led remote blood pressure monitoring program achieved a mean BP reduction of 11.4/3.4 mmHg and yielded a BP control rate of 37.5% (P<0.01) among rural Medicare patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: