Rising urban freight and decarbonization pressures raise an increasingly pressing question: can metros provide green freight mobility without harming passengers? We develop a policy-evaluation framework for metro-based underground logistics (MUL) that integrates multi-task demand forecasting, capacity-constrained freight realization, and emissions accounting under passenger-priority operations. Shanghai's empirical results have showed that freight demand peaks tend to occur outside passenger peaks, while high-volume freight OD flows are less concentrated along major passenger commuting corridors. Under our baseline setting, MUL realizes 66.69% of metro-replaceable demand on weekdays and 92.28% on weekends, with estimated net CO 2 reductions of 14.86% and 24.32%, respectively, after accounting for feeder travel, detours, and unrealized demand. The weekend estimate is more sensitive to freight-demand prediction uncertainty. Scenario comparisons identify station-proximate eligibility, direct routing, off-peak operation, and freight capacity allocation as the main operational levers shaping mitigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: