The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is used to assess breast cancer response but may be influenced by perfusion and T2-related effects. The aim of the study was to compare ADC-only, slow diffusion coefficient (SDC)-only, and combined ADC–SDC models and to evaluate whether SDC provides information complementary to ADC for post-treatment assessment of pathological complete response (pCR). This retrospective secondary analysis included 84 patients from the ACRIN-6698/I-SPY2 dataset, including 32 with pCR. ADC was calculated from b = 0 and 800 s/mm2 and SDC from b = 600 and 800 s/mm2. Lesion-mean values and treatment-related changes were evaluated using 100 repetitions of nested fivefold cross-validation. All normalization, random-forest ranking, and LASSO tuning and selection were performed within the training data. The combined rcADC–rcSDC model achieved the highest mean cross-validated AUC of 0.724. Its aggregated out-of-fold AUC was 0.728, compared with 0.633 for rcADC alone; however, the paired AUC difference was not statistically significant. Treatment-related SDC changes may complement conventional ADC changes in post-treatment pCR assessment. Although the combined rcADC–rcSDC model achieved the highest observed discrimination, a statistically significant improvement over that of rcADC alone was not demonstrated. These exploratory findings require technical and external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakoda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: