Microbial colony analysis is routinely used in clinical microbiology, pharmaceutical quality control, food safety, and environmental monitoring. Colony enumeration remains challenging because real-world plates frequently show crowding, size variation, background debris, and plate-rim interference. Low contrast on membrane or filter media, weak colony boundaries, and ultra-dense or too-numerous-to-count (TNTC) growth further complicate analysis. These conditions increase counting variability and limit rule-based counters. This review examines artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled colony analysis and links recurrent plate-reading challenges to method selection and validation requirements. We examine traditional threshold- and morphology-based pipelines, object detection, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, and density- or keypoint-based estimation. Current evidence is stronger for plate-level triage and semi-quantitative interpretation than for direct colony enumeration. However, evidence supporting routine quantitative colony-forming unit (CFU) reporting across laboratories remains limited. Reliable deployment requires methods suited to plate format, organism, imaging conditions, and intended use, with validation in the target workflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: