The rapid growth of AI data-center loads, amplified by typhoon-induced thermal coupling between workloads and cooling systems, poses new challenges to transmission grid vulnerability assessment and scheduling. This paper develops a vulnerability-aware reinforcement-learning (RL) scheduling framework that integrates a measured-data-driven AI load model, a typhoon-day temperature–PUE–cooling model, a seven-indicator vulnerability assessment covering physical, structural, and AI-specific dimensions, and RL scheduling via PPO, SAC, and TD3 with a PTDF-based top- K branch-selection mechanism that confines control to AI-responsive branches. Validation on the IEEE 39-bus and 118-bus systems shows that all three RL algorithms achieve statistically significant V DC reductions of 6.9–9.3% ( p < .001), with PPO outperforming an LP comparator by 3.4–8.4% on the 118- and 1354-bus systems. The reduction magnitude correlates with the vulnerability-gradient signal—the product of mean PTDF sensitivity and baseline vulnerability—rather than with system size per se: on the PEGASE 1354-bus system, where the AI load represents only 0.016% of total system demand and the transmission network is highly robust, no scheduling strategy produces a meaningful V DC response, confirming a physical optimization ceiling governed by AI load penetration rather than network size. Under extreme stress at 3.0 × AI load, TD3 reduces EENS by 44%, confirming V DC as a proactive leading indicator of curtailment risk. An ablation study identifies topological sensitivity as the most influential indicator. The proposed framework provides grid operators with ex-ante guidance on when vulnerability-aware scheduling becomes effective, based on the relationship between AI load penetration, vulnerability gradients, and system controllability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: