Key result
Higher lipid accumulation product is linked to ~3-fold greater cardiometabolic multimorbidity risk.
Why the study?
Conventional adiposity measures do not adequately capture visceral fat and lipid-metabolic disturbances underlying cardiometabolic multimorbidity in ageing populations.
Does higher baseline lipid accumulation product (LAP) increase incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) in middle-aged and older Chinese adults?
Cohort (n=7,563)
Yes
Does higher baseline lipid accumulation product (LAP) increase incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) in middle-aged and older Chinese adults?
Hazard Ratio: 3.03 (95% CI 2.33–3.93)
Higher baseline lipid accumulation product (LAP) is strongly associated with an increased risk of developing cardiometabolic multimorbidity in older adults, a relationship that is partially mediated by systemic inflammation.
Cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) is a growing public-health burden in ageing populations, yet conventional adiposity measures such as body mass index and waist circumference do not adequately capture the visceral fat and lipid-metabolic disturbances that underlie it. We investigated the association between the lipid accumulation product (LAP) and incident CMM in middle-aged and older Chinese adults, and examined whether systemic inflammation mediates this association. We analysed data from five waves (2011–2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), comprising 7563 participants aged 45 years or older who were free of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes at baseline and had complete LAP and white blood cell (WBC) count data. CMM was defined as the coexistence of two or more cardiometabolic conditions among heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The association between LAP and incident CMM was assessed using Cox proportional-hazards models with subgroup and restricted cubic spline analyses, and the mediating effects of inflammatory markers (WBC count and C-reactive protein [CRP]) were evaluated by causal mediation analysis. Over a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 486 participants (6.43%) developed CMM. After multivariable adjustment, LAP was positively associated with CMM: each one-unit increase in the base-10 logarithm of LAP (LgLAP) corresponded to a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.03 (95% CI 2.33–3.93), and risk rose across LAP quartiles (quartile 4 vs. quartile 1 h 3.41, 95% CI 2.49–4.67; P for trend < 0.001). Adding LAP to a base model raised the C-index from 0.624 to 0.674, with corresponding gains in the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI); the model including both LAP and WBC had a C-index of 0.677. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed a non-linear, positive dose–response relationship ( P for non-linearity = 0.003). The association was stronger in normotensive than in hypertensive participants (HR 4.39 vs. 2.19; P for interaction = 0.020) but remained significant in both. In mediation analysis, WBC count and log-transformed CRP each significantly mediated the association, accounting for 5.1% and 8.4% of the total effect, respectively. In middle-aged and older Chinese adults, a higher baseline LAP was associated with an increased risk of incident CMM, and systemic inflammation—indexed by WBC count and CRP—partially mediated this association. As an inexpensive and routinely available index, LAP may help identify people at risk of CMM, particularly among those without hypertension. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maiturouze et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) (n=7,563). Lipid accumulation product (LAP) vs. Lower LAP (e.g., Quartile 1) was evaluated on Incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) (HR 3.03, 95% CI 2.33-3.93). Each one-unit increase in the base-10 logarithm of lipid accumulation product was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (HR 3.03; 95% CI 2.33-3.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: