This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Calcium looping is a promising CO2 capture technology, and the mechanical stability of calcium-based adsorbent pellets is critical for their industrial application. Although pelletization processes and formulation optimization can improve the initial strength, the strength evolution of pellets during carbonation/calcination cycles and the underlying dominant mechanism remains little understood. This study identified two major effects governing pellet strength evolution during cyclic reactions: the thermal-driven effect (thermal shock damage and high-temperature sintering) and the reaction-induced effect (volume change damage and reactive sintering). Their respective roles and relative contributions at different cycling stages were systematically investigated by combining carbonation/calcination cycling tests, short-term thermal shock tests, and nonreactive long-term thermal cycling control experiments. The results indicate that the CaO pellets show an early decline in strength, followed by a partial recovery in later cycles. Mechanistic analysis indicates that thermal shock promotes pellet cracking, while cyclic volume expansion/contraction caused by the CaO/CaCO3 phase transformation can induce local stress concentration, both of which cause strength degradation. In contrast, sintering-induced densification enhances structural strength, thereby contributing to late-stage strength recovery. Relative contribution analysis reveals a clear stage-dependent transition in the factors governing strength evolution. The thermal-driven effect dominates the early stage, contributing over 70% in the 0–5 cycle, whereas the reaction-induced effect gradually increased to over 60% in the 20–25 cycle and became dominant later. This study provides mechanistic insights into the strength evolution of calcium-based pellets during calcium looping and offers guidance for improving the mechanical stability of calcium-based pellets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: