This research work aims to implement empirical models for predicting the failure pressure of a pipeline corroded with a single defect and internal pressure applications. For this purpose, five approaches were used: two artificial intelligence (AI) models with experimental data, a finite-element model (FEM), and two analytical models (ASME B31G modified and DNV-RP-F101). The two proposed artificial models were implemented and optimized in order to find their best performance. The first AI method is an artificial neural network with multilayer perceptron (ANN-MLP), and the second is a support vector machine radial basis function (SVM-RBF). The comparison of the results of these two models proves the good precision of the ANN-MLP, with the correlation coefficient R = 0.9906 and R = 0.9888, ahead of the SVM-RBF with R = 0.9290 and R = 0.9260, respectively, for the two phases of training and testing. In addition, the output results of ANN-MLP are analyzed by William’s diagram; it was noted that 97.82% (180/184) of points belong to the field of validity and applicability of the artificial optimal model. In addition, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates a linear correlation between depth defect and the failure pressure with 32.77%, followed by the length of defect and the inner diameter with 20.04% and 19.81%, respectively. According to the present regression analysis, the results obtained from the ANN-MLP and finite-element method (FEM) are more accurate compared with SVM-RBF and other analytical models. However, the predicted failure pressure values demonstrated strong agreement across all the five approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maizia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: