Using new consumer-panel data across multiple grocery retailers, I estimate that an additional SNAP dollar raises food-at-home spending by 48 cents (s.e. 6 cents). This multi-retailer estimate is broadly in line with the 59-cent estimate in Hastings and Shapiro (2018), reinforcing evidence that SNAP benefits are non-fungible. Linking food-at-home and food-away-from-home purchases to nutritional data, I find that SNAP substantially increases calorie purchases but has little effect on nutritional composition per calorie. A behavioral welfare calibration implies an efficiency cost of in-kind provision of 12–14 cents per SNAP dollar; because this calculation is highly sensitive to the MPC, pinning down the parameter is quantitatively important.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jintaek Song (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: