Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed as “grid copilots” for alarm interpretation, procedural retrieval, incident summarization, scenario analysis, and tool-mediated power-system studies. This review combines a PRISMA 2020-informed systematic identification/screening component with structured qualitative synthesis across power systems, LLM agents, trustworthy AI, and safety-critical decision support. The documented review pathway identified 312 records, removed 48 duplicates, screened 264 records, and assessed 213 full-text articles; after incorporation of additional recent and methodological literature, the current manuscript draws on a total evidence base of 199 references. The synthesis shows that recent tool-using agents can execute power-flow/OPF and contingency workflows, but operational trust remains conditional on authenticated state/topology, valid models and constraints, solver/tool correctness, uncertainty calibration, deadline compliance, human authority, cybersecurity, and reconstructable audit evidence. We therefore present VDS-LLM-Grid as an evidence-informed conceptual reference architecture—not a validated deployment—that integrates six assurance layers: input/state grounding, constraint-aware reasoning, independent verification, calibrated uncertainty with abstention, human oversight, and governance/auditability within a cross-cutting cybersecurity boundary. The paper defines conditional “verifiable decision support,” mathematical system-level metrics, deadline-aware routing, and a study-level evidence map that prioritizes empirical end-to-end validation, constraint verification, calibration, latency, cybersecurity, robustness, and operator evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sulaima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: