The accelerating production and rapid obsolescence of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) devices have intensified the global electronic waste crisis, highlighting the urgent need to transition from linear to circular economic models. However, empirical understanding remains constrained because consumer purchasing priorities and end-of-life disposal habits are typically evaluated as isolated phenomena rather than interconnected stages. To address this gap, this study conducts a novel integrated analysis of the ICT device lifecycle by examining procurement criteria alongside post-use disposition within the same household cohort. Utilising a nationally representative sample from Ireland ( n = 1510), latent class analysis was applied across three device categories - mobile phones, laptops, and desktop computers – to uncover underlying behavioural patterns. The model identifies four distinct consumer archetypes: Pragmatic Recyclers , E-Waste Active/Tech-Engaged , Price-Sensitive Hibernators , and Conscious Consumers . Findings demonstrate a pervasive cross-lifecycle behavioural misalignment. While environmental awareness influences procurement preferences among certain groups, these green intentions rarely translate into circular disposal. Instead, ‘digital hibernation’ predominates downstream; with over 63% of households storing redundant smartphones rather than utilising recycling or secondary market channels. Crucially, upfront price sensitivity and post-use storage habits emerge as the primary structural barriers to material recovery. By segmenting the population into functional archetypes, this research offers granular evidence to inform targeted policy interventions. Furthermore, it provides an adaptable empirical framework for other countries seeking to align household-level behaviour with national circular economy targets, fostering a synchronised global response to the e-waste crisis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gretta Mohan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: