Key result
Dobutamine stress echo shows higher specificity than Th-DIP at ~94% for predicting myocardial recovery.
Why the study?
The feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography and Th-DIP SPECT for predicting functional improvement after revascularization in chronic ischemic heart disease were assessed.
Observational (n=31)
Both methods appear feasible and safe for viability assessment; leaves open their relative accuracy for predicting post-revascularization recovery.
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and respective diagnostic accuracy of low-dose dobutamine infusion and rest-redistribution-reinjection thallium 201 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) after dipyridamole infusion (Th-DIP), in the prediction of functional improvement of asynergic infarcted zones, after successful revascularization in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. Thirty-one patients with a previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction: 41 +/- 5.8%) were studied. The regional wall motion of the left ventricle was evaluated by basic echocardiography before and 14 +/- 1.7 weeks after successful revascularization (19 by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and 12 by coronary artery bypass grafting). Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) was performed in all patients with dobutamine infusion of 5 and 10 micrograms/kg/minute over five minutes. Within three days after DSE and prior to revascularization, all patients underwent Th-DIP for myocardial viability assessment. A 16-ventricular-segment model was used for basic, DSE, and Th-DIP images. Viability was assessed by applying the standard criteria for each technique. In the 31 patients, 496 segments were analyzed. By basic echocardiography, 164 (33%) of them were classified as asynergic. The DSE detected viable tissue in 69/496 (14%) segments, whereas Th-DIP identified viability in 95/496 (19%) segments. When the postrevascularization basic echocardiographic study was used as the gold standard in identifying myocardial viability, the sensitivity and specificity for the DSE and Th-DIP were 86.5%, 94.4% and 90.5%, 69%, respectively. No major side effects were observed with both techniques. In conclusion, DSE seems to be an accurate method for identifying viable but asynergic myocardium in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease, whereas Th-DIP overestimates the postrevascularization recovery. Detection of hibernating myocardium can be obtained by these two noninvasive methods. However, DSE seems to be more useful in determining the prospective selection of patients who are going to benefit from revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kostopoulos et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Chronic ischemic heart disease with previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction (n=31). Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) vs. Quantitative SPECT Rest-Redistribution-Reinjection 201TI Imaging After Dipyridamole Infusion (Th-DIP) was evaluated on Prediction of functional improvement of asynergic infarcted zones after successful revascularization (diagnostic sensitivity and specificity). Dobutamine stress echocardiography yielded a sensitivity of 86.5% and specificity of 94.4% for predicting myocardial functional improvement, compared to 90.5% and 69% respectively for Th-DIP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: