Key result
Exercise-induced ST elevation predicts poor 6-year survival, but loses significance after invasive evaluation.
Why the study?
The functional and prognostic significance of exercise-induced ST elevation in ambulatory patients with coronary heart disease required further evaluation in a larger cohort.
Cohort (n=3,050)
Exercise-induced ST elevation identifies high-risk patients pre-invasively; extends SHW observations but is not independent once catheterization data are known.
The functional and prognostic significance of exercise-induced ST elevation (by computer averaging) in ambulatory patients with coronary heart disease was recently reported for 181 patients in the Seattle Heart Watch (SHW). To further evaluate this, 3050 approximately similar patients enrolled in CASS were analyzed with respect to initial findings, survival, and incidence of secondary coronary events over the next 6 years. The ST elevation responses in CASS patients were classified by visual interpretation of 1 mm or more, whereas the SHW patients were identified by voltage greater than 0 mV. Accordingly, prevalence of exercise-induced ST elevation was lower in CASS patients, but they had greater frequencies of prior myocardial infarction and left ventricular enlargement and dysfunction. The poor survival was similar in the subgroup with ST elevation during exercise and recovery in CASS and SHW. Although not an independent predictor when invasive variables are known, ST elevation emerges as a useful predictor when exercise testing is performed before diagnostic invasive studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce et al. (1988) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=3,050). Exercise-induced ST elevation vs. Absence of exercise-induced ST elevation was evaluated on Survival and incidence of secondary coronary events. Exercise-induced ST elevation was a predictor of poor 6-year survival prior to diagnostic invasive studies, though not an independent predictor when invasive variables were known.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: