Key result
Novel phonocardiogram-based algorithm reduces heart rate monitoring errors across resting, speaking, and walking states.
Why the study?
Continuous heart rate monitoring during normal activities such as speaking and walking is important for outpatients but challenging due to noise interference in phonocardiogram signals.
PCG-based HR monitoring may enable continuous outpatient tracking amid noise; leaves open prospective validation against ECG before clinical adoption.
For outpatients who need continuous monitoring of heart rate (HR) variation, it is important that HR can be monitored during normal activities such as speaking and walking. In this study, a noise-robust real-time HR monitoring algorithm based on phonocardiogram (PCG) signals is proposed. PCG signals were recorded using an electronic stethoscope; electrocardiogram (ECG) signals were recorded simultaneously with HR references. The proposed algorithm consisted of pre-processing, peak/nonpeak classification, voice noise processing, walking noise processing, and HR calculation. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated using PCG/ECG signals from 11 healthy participants. For comparison, the absolute errors between manually extracted ECG-based HR values and automatically calculated PCG-based HR values were calculated for the proposed algorithm and the comparison algorithm in two different test protocols. Experimental results showed that the average absolute errors of the proposed algorithm were 72.03%, 22.92%, and 36.39% of the values of the comparison algorithm for resting-state, speaking-state, and walking-state data, respectively, in protocol-1. In protocol-2, the average absolute error was 36.99% of that of the comparison algorithm. A total of 1102 cases in protocol-1 and 783 in protocol-2 had an absolute error [Formula: see text] beats per minute (BPM) using the comparison algorithm and an absolute error [Formula: see text] BPM using the proposed algorithm. On the basis of these results, we anticipate that the proposed algorithm can potentially improve the performance of continuous real-time HR monitoring during activities of normal life, thereby improving the safety of outpatients with cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nam et al. (2018) studied Healthy (n=11). Phonocardiogram-based noise-robust real-time heart rate monitoring algorithm vs. Comparison algorithm was evaluated on Absolute errors between manually extracted ECG-based heart rate values and automatically calculated PCG-based heart rate values. A phonocardiogram-based heart rate monitoring algorithm reduced average absolute errors to 22.92%-72.03% of a comparison algorithm's values during resting, speaking, and walking states.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: