Key result
The IL-6 gene -572 C allele was significantly associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction compared to the G allele (OR 0.85), suggesting a potential protective effect.
Why the study?
The association between interleukin-6 gene −572 G>C polymorphism and myocardial infarction risk has not been established.
Meta-Analysis (n=5,553)
Odds Ratio: 0.85 (95% CI 0.73–0.99)
p-value: p=0.041
Introduction The association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene −572 G^C polymorphism and myocardial infarction (MI) risk has not been established. We adopted this meta-analysis for further insight into the case–control studies. Materials and methods To investigate the genetic association, we searched multiple databases, including Web of Science, EMbase, CBM disc, PubMed and CNKI. Also, we manually identified the searched references. All the statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 11.0. Results A total of five studies were identified, involving 2,526 MI cases and 3,027 controls. The results revealed a significant association between IL-6 gene −572 G^C polymorphism and MI, implying that the IL-6 gene −572 C allele may be a protective factor for MI (for C allele vs K allele: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73–0.99, p = 0.041; for C/C vs G/G: OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.31–0.98, p = 0.044; for C/C vs G/C + G/G: OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41–0.89, p = 0.011). However, in the subgroup analysis with regard to ethnicity, no significant correlation was identified between IL-6 gene −572 G^C polymorphism and MI among Europeans. Conclusion The IL-6 gene −572 C allele may be a protective factor for MI. Future studies involving larger sample bases are still recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Myocardial infarction (n=5,553). IL-6 gene -572 C allele vs. G allele was evaluated on Myocardial infarction risk (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99, p=0.041). The IL-6 gene -572 C allele was significantly associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction compared to the G allele (OR 0.85), suggesting a potential protective effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: