Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Buccal movements at the air-water interface causing surface water and air bubble inhalation ("surface breathing") and the resultant effects on blood O₂ transport have been quantified as a function of inspired water Po₂ in the goldfish, Carassius auratus. At 26 C, surface breathing occurred below a Po₂ of about 70 mmHg and increased to a peak of 180 surface breathing periods/h at Po₂ 20 mmHg. At this severe level of hypoxia, surface breathing resulted in a significant elevation of arterial Po₂ by 1.2 mmHg above that in control goldfish, which were not surface breathing. This very small rise in arterial Po₂ caused a sharp rise in arterial blood O₂ saturation from 16% to 33%, because of the high oxygen affinity (P50 = 2.6 mmHg) and steep slope of the blood O₂ equilibrium curve. The net effect of surface breathing at the air-water interface during severe aquatic hypoxia is a 2.5 times increase in the arterial-venous O₂ saturation difference compared with strictly aquatic ventilation. Surface breathing with a nitrogen rather than air atmosphere significantly increased surface-breathing frequency and significantly decreased arterial blood oxygenation at a constant water Po₂. Surface breathing, which includes both "air gulping" and irrigation of the gills with the surface water layer, is thus demonstrated to have a significant respiratory function in the goldfish.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warren W. Burggren (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: