Key result
ApoC-II mimetic peptide markedly enhances LPL-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis by stabilizing active enzyme conformations.
Why the study?
The conformational dynamics governing lipoprotein lipase activity and its interactions with cofactors remain poorly defined.
ApoC-II-P stabilizes lipoprotein lipase conformations and enhances its triglyceride hydrolysis activity, offering a potential molecular strategy for treating diseases related to lipid metabolism dysfunction.
Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is the rate-limiting enzyme in lipoprotein metabolism, and its dysfunction contributes to cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease. However, the conformational dynamics governing LPL activity and cofactor interactions remain poorly defined. Here, we perform comprehensive microscale molecular dynamics simulations of full-length LPL, incorporating a predicted lid domain and examining LPL alone and in complex with an apolipoprotein C-II mimetic peptide (ApoC-II-P). We show that the flexible lid adopts multiple orientations that regulate lipid pore accessibility, catalytic activity, and lipid binding. We also identify ∼180° flipping of the C-terminal domain (CTD). ApoC-II-P stabilizes LPL conformations by bridging the N-terminal domain (NTD) and CTD and maintaining lid flexibility. Biochemical and cellular assays corroborate these findings, demonstrating that ApoC-II-P markedly enhances LPL-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis and phagocytosis. Our findings reveal interdomain interactions governing LPL activity and support ApoC-II-P as a promising strategy to enhance LPL function and improve disease outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lietzke et al. (2026) studied this question. ApoC-II mimetic peptide (ApoC-II-P) vs. LPL alone was evaluated on LPL conformation, triglyceride hydrolysis, and phagocytosis. ApoC-II mimetic peptide markedly enhanced LPL-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis and phagocytosis by stabilizing LPL conformations and maintaining lid flexibility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: