Why the study?
PCSK9 inhibitors have shown significant LDL cholesterol lowering in ASCVD and familial hypercholesterolemia, but initial clinical experience in a university lipid clinic setting was not well described.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
165 candidates for PCSK9 inhibitors in a university-based adult lipid clinic
Comparison
PCSK9 inhibitor treatment in patients with statin intolerance and without
Design
Retrospective review of clinical and lipid data
Follow-up
Average 14 months
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have demonstrated significant lowering of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We retrospectively reviewed data concerning use of PCSK9 inhibitors from patients in our university-based adult lipid clinic. Data collected included clinical pre-treatment variables and pre-and post-treatment non-fasting lipid profiles. Of 165 candidates, 163 were approved for PCSK9 inhibition (90% ASCVD and 10% FH). A majority of patients (72%) had statin intolerance. Treatment was provided and assessed in 141 patients. After three doses of medications, LDL cholesterol fell from 170 + 58 mg/dL to 76 + 45 mg/dL (55%, P<0.001). There were no differences in efficacy according to sex, elevated lipoprotein(a), and the PCS-K9 inhibitor utilized. Continued efficacy was evaluated in 101 patients with LDL decreasing further from initial follow-up to long-term follow-up over an average of 14 months (74 ± 44 mg/dL to 68 ± 41 mg/dL). Permanent discontinuation of PCS-K9 inhibitor because of side effects occurred in 11% of patients. When strict adherence to guidelines was applied, >95% approval rate was obtained, and there was similar efficacy in LDL lowering to what has been previously reported irrespective of statin intolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morise et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: