Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To investigate the cellular effects of 1.1 MHz high-intensity focused continuous wave (CW) ultrasound alone and in combination with X-rays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: V79 cells were exposed to ultrasound of different intensities for 30s (non-hyperthermic conditions). In the combined treatments, cells were exposed to ultrasound (63 W/cm2) either before or after 2 Gy X-irradiation. Cellular effects studied were clonogenic survival, DNA strand breaks (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, DNA precipitation assay) and membrane integrity (morphological analysis). RESULTS: With increasing ultrasound intensity, cell survival decreased in a dose-dependent manner as the induction of DNA strand breaks, the fraction of cells with lost membrane integrity and cell lysis increased. In the treatments with combined exposures, the regimen with X-rays before ultrasound had a nearly additive effect on cell kill, whereas the reverse regimen with ultrasound exposure before X-irradiation resulted in a synergistic effect (p<0.012). CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity focused CW ultrasound induces an intensity-dependent reduction in clonogenic survival in V79 cells, which seems to depend on both DNA and membrane damage. Combined exposures of ultrasound and X-rays resulted in a synergistic reduction in cell survival when cells were exposed to ultrasound before X-rays but not for the reverse regimen. Thus, a larger fraction of the repairable sublethal cell damage induced by an initial ultrasound exposure was rendered non-repairable by a subsequent X-ray exposure than if the reverse treatment order was used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jernberg et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: