Key result
Non-invasive pre-Glenn imaging is linked to an absolute ~19% reduction in procedural complications vs catheterisation.
Why the study?
Patients with univentricular heart defects require lifelong imaging surveillance, and recent advances allow replacing routine invasive catheterisation with non-invasive imaging, but safety and cost savings of this transition need description.
Cohort (n=130)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: Patients with univentricular heart defects require lifelong imaging surveillance. Recent advances in non-invasive imaging have enabled replacing these patients’ routine catheterisation. Our objective was to describe the safety and cost savings of transition of a tertiary care children’s hospital from routine invasive to routine non-invasive imaging of low-risk patients with univentricular heart defects. Methods: This single-centre cohort study consists of 1) a retrospective analysis of the transition from cardiac catheterisation (n = 21) to CT angiography (n = 20) before bidirectional Glenn operation and 2) a prospective study (n = 89) describing cardiac magnetic resonance before and after the total cavopulmonary connection in low-risk patients with univentricular heart defects. Results: Pre-Glenn: The total length of CT angiography was markedly shorter compared to the catheterisation: 30 min (range: 20–60) and 125 min (range: 70–220), respectively (p < 0.001). Catheterisation used more iodine contrast agents than CT angiography, 19 ± 3.9 ml, and 10 ± 2.4 ml, respectively (p < 0.001). Controlled ventilation was used for all catheterised and 3 (15%) CT angiography patients (p < 0.001). No complications occurred during CT angiography, while they emerged in 19% (4/21) catheterisation cases (p < 0.001). CT angiography and catheterisation showed no significant difference in the radiation exposure. Pre-/post-total cavopulmonary connection: All cardiac magnetic resonance studies were successful, and no complications occurred. In 60% of the cardiac magnetic resonance (53/89), no sedation was performed, and peripheral venous pressure was measured in all cases. Cost analysis suggests that moving to non-invasive imaging yielded cost savings of at least €2500–4000 per patient. Conclusion: Transition from routine invasive to routine non-invasive pre-and post-operative imaging is safely achievable with cost savings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanovskiy et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Univentricular heart defects (n=130). Non-invasive imaging (CT angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance) vs. Cardiac catheterisation (invasive imaging) was evaluated on Complications during the procedure (Phase 1 pre-Glenn imaging) (p=<0.001). Institutional transition to non-invasive imaging for low-risk children with univentricular heart defects eliminated procedure complications compared to catheterisation (0% vs 19%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: