Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We studied in situ and in the laboratory whether the organic horizon (O horizon) could act as a physical ‘buffer system’ against soil dryness and water stress for the CH4 oxidizing microbes in boreal coniferous forest soil. The laboratory experiments with samples from a Scots pine forest soil showed that the CH4 oxidation took place in the uppermost mineral soil and was not affected by removal of the O horizon (peeling) and irrigation. The removal of a thin O horizon (2–3 cm) in early June increased the mean summertime uptake of CH4 by 50% and decreased the release of CO2 by 50%. Thus, the O horizon acts as a diffusion barrier, lowering the uptake rate of atmospheric CH4. The experimental 50% increase in precipitation by irrigation (from 58 to 84 mm month−1) had only a marginal effect on the gas fluxes in both control plots and peeled plots. During the study summer two dry periods with low matric potentials (<−1 MPa) in mineral soil occurred without there being any reduction in CH4 uptake. In laboratory experiments, the gravimetric water content of 12% (−9 kPa) led to the maximum CH4 oxidation. The CH4 oxidation was still 60% of the maximum at a water content of 4% (<−1.5 MPa) and totally inhibited at a water content of 1%. The results reveal that a low soil water content is not an important factor in restricting CH4 oxidation in mineral soil of boreal forests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saari et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: