Key result
Prolonged rhythmic handgrip exercise significantly reduces vascular conductance in non-exercising limbs.
Why the study?
The difference in vascular conductance changes in brachial and femoral arteries of non-exercising limbs during handgrip exercise at different intensities was unclear.
p-value: p=<0.05
Small study shows intensity-dependent BVC drop in non-exercising arm at 45% MVC; leaves open relevance to clinical exercise or larger cohorts.
The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in vascular conductance changes in brachial and femoral artery (BVC, FVC) of non-exercising limbs during handgrip exercise at different intensities. Six subjects performed rhythmic handgrip exercise, which consisted of 2-second contraction and 2-second relaxation at the intensities of 15%, 30%, and 45% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Brachial and femoral artery blood flow (Doppler ultrasound method) of non-exercising limbs, blood pressure, and heart rate were measured. The BVC during exercise at lower intensities (15% and 30%MVC) and FVC during exercise at any of three intensities did not change significantly. However, BVC significantly decreased at 45%MVC when the exercise was continued to longer than 60% of maximal endurance time (P<0.05). These results suggest that FVC of the non-exercising limb dose not change during handgrip exercise at the intensity lower than 45%MVC, but BVC of the non-exercising limb change during handgrip exercise depending on the exercise intensity and duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshizawa et al. (2006) studied this question. Rhythmic handgrip exercise was evaluated on Vascular conductance changes in brachial and femoral artery (BVC, FVC) of non-exercising limbs (p=<0.05). Rhythmic handgrip exercise at 45% of maximal voluntary contraction significantly decreased brachial artery vascular conductance in non-exercising limbs when continued beyond 60% of maximal endurance time (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: