This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Burn surgery requires rapid, evidence-based decision-making across acute resuscitation, operative management, and reconstruction. Despite increasing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical decision support, no burn-specific system currently exists that provides transparent, citation-traceable guidance suitable for time-critical surgical care. METHODS: We developed BurnRAG, a burn surgery-specific retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) clinical decision support system using a hierarchical RAPTOR architecture and a curated corpus of 4683 peer-reviewed burn surgery articles (2000-2025). Ten expert-designed clinical scenarios spanning acute management, operative decision-making, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and mass casualty triage were evaluated. Performance was characterized using semantic similarity (SEM-eval), maximum and mean similarity scores, a holistic G Score assessing response completeness, content coverage analysis, and manual citation verification. RESULTS: BurnRAG demonstrated consistently high evidence-alignment performance across scenarios, with mean semantic similarity of 0.94 ± 0.02 and mean G Score of 0.97 ± 0.06. The system synthesized an average of 6.8 peer-reviewed sources per query, with 100% citation accuracy on manual review. Highest performance was observed in acute surgical decision-making scenarios, including escharotomy planning, fluid resuscitation with inhalation injury, and early excision timing. Reconstructive and rehabilitation scenarios also demonstrated robust multi-source synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: BurnRAG is the first burn-specific, citation-traceable AI system designed to synthesize peer-reviewed evidence across the burn care continuum. By providing transparent, source-attributed guidance for emergency triage, operative planning, and reconstruction, BurnRAG establishes a foundation for specialty-focused AI integration in burn surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özmen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: