Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multi-wavelength dielectric metagratings require subwavelength material patterns that balance wavelength-dependent diffraction, material dispersion, and binarization. We combine the GLOnet generative inverse-design architecture with FMMAX, an open-source JAX-native rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) library, to optimize this problem with end-to-end automatic differentiation. The revised physical protocol uses one fixed 1039.23 nm period and targets the transmitted +1 diffraction order at 700, 800, and 900 nm. The corresponding air-side output angles are 42.34 ∘ , 50.34 ∘ , and 60.00 ∘ , respectively, as required by the grating equation. This defines one physical silicon-ridge metagrating rather than three wavelength-scaled geometries. The framework produces distributions of binary silicon/air candidates and supports a multi-wavelength objective without wavelength-specific adjoint derivations. Across five independent GLOnet training seeds, the mean three-wavelength candidate efficiency was 0.625 ± 0.091 (mean and sample standard deviation of the five seed-level means). A matched 500-start Adam direct pixel-optimization baseline had a final-iterate ensemble mean of 0.639; retaining the best binary checkpoint along each trajectory gave 0.699 ± 0.100. The best candidate from the best-of-five GLOnet run reached a mean of 0.884 and a three-wavelength bottleneck of 0.843, compared with direct-baseline maxima of 0.835 and 0.798. Thus, the generator exhibited a higher best-case ceiling but substantial seed dependence, whereas direct optimization was the stronger typical baseline. These results establish a reproducible differentiable generative workflow while delimiting, rather than assuming, its optimization advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: