Key result
Rare double chamber left ventricle mimics pseudoaneurysm on CMRI, requiring surgical diagnosis.
Why the study?
Double chambered left ventricle (DCLV) is an extremely rare congenital malformation that is often misdiagnosed due to its rarity and imaging challenges.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case highlights that double chambered left ventricle can persist asymptomatically into adulthood and be misdiagnosed as a pseudoaneurysm with thrombus on CMRI, emphasizing the need for careful multimodality evaluation.
A double chambered left ventricle (DCLV) is an extremely rare congenital malformation. In this anomaly left ventricle (LV) is divided into two sub-sections by a muscle bundle or a septum: main left ventricular chamber (MLVC) and accessory chamber. The reported prevalence of DCLV is 0.04%-0.42%; however, the precise prevalence is not determined. In this case, we are reporting a 54 years old man who was referred to cardiologist with a complaint of chest pain. He had a history of systemic hypertension. With regard to echocardiographic findings, the patient was diagnosed to have a left ventricular aneurism or DCLV. For further evaluation, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) was recommended. The results of CMRI revealed pseudo-aneurism with laminated thrombus. Nonetheless, through cardiac surgery DCLV with thick bundles was diagnosed. DCLV is rarely detected in adult patients since, in case of presence, it is mainly diagnosed during infancy or early childhood. Echocardiography is the initial imaging tool for diagnosis of DCLV; however, CMRI improves the chance of accurate diagnosis of the condition by providing a more detailed view.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salehi et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Double chamber left ventricle (n=1). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated. A rare case of double chamber left ventricle in an adult was misdiagnosed as a pseudo-aneurysm by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and correctly identified during surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: