Key result
Active treatment linked to ~11-fold higher hospital mortality in tPA-treated acute ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Limited resources and the need to optimize neuroICU admissions for acute ischemic stroke patients receiving tPA motivated investigation of models predicting who benefits from neuroICU admission.
Cohort (n=80)
No
Odds Ratio: 11 (95% CI 1.4–88)
Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 4.7%
p-value: p=0.02
BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to receive one or more of 30 subsequent active life supporting treatments. Two groups of patients were compared: low risk monitor (LRM) (patients who did not receive active treatment (AT) on the first day and whose risk of ever receiving active treatment was ≤ 10%) and AT (patients who received at least one treatment on any day of their ICU admission). RESULTS: Compared to LRM group (21 patients), AT group (59 patients) had similar age (75 ± 13 vs. 72 ± 17, P = 0.4), similar gender (male: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.8), similar National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS, 16 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8, P = 0.4), and higher Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (62 ± 26 vs. 41 ± 15, P = 0.0008). Compared to LRM group, AT group had longer ICU length of stay (4.5 ± 4.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.04), higher ICU mortality (22% vs. 4.7% (one patient DNR/hospice); OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.7 - 46.0; P = 0.1), and higher hospital mortality (36% vs. 4.7%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 1.4 - 88.0; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The outcome of LRM patients with stroke post-tPA suggests that they may not require admission to a formal neuroICU, improving resource use and reducing costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadaka et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=80). Active life-supporting treatment (AT group) vs. Low risk monitor (LRM) group was evaluated on Hospital mortality (OR 11, 95% CI 1.4 - 88.0, p=0.02). Among acute ischemic stroke patients receiving tPA, those in the active treatment group had significantly higher hospital mortality (36% vs 4.7%; OR 11) compared to low-risk monitored patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: