Key result
CT-detected PFO linked to ~2.4-fold higher risk of ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
The prognostic significance of patent foramen ovale detected by cardiac computed tomography for ischemic stroke risk remains unclear.
Cohort (n=1,028)
Hazard Ratio: 2.41 (95% CI 1.36–4.29)
p-value: p=0.003
Detection of a patent foramen ovale on cardiac CT is independently associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke, suggesting prognostic utility of this imaging finding.
CT-detected PFO prognostic value for stroke remains uncertain; leaves open need for prospective validation vs echocardiography.
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with embolic stroke; however, the prognostic significance of PFO detected by cardiac computed tomography (CT) remains unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association between CT-detected PFO and subsequent ischemic stroke risk, and to assess its agreement with transthoracic echocardiography with agitated saline (Bubble-TTE). We retrospectively analyzed 1,028 patients who underwent cardiac CT between 2016 and 2018. PFO was diagnosed on cardiac CT using criteria adapted from previous reports. In a subset of 86 patients, intermodality agreement between cardiac CT and Bubble-TTE was assessed. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. CT-detected PFO was identified in 212 patients (20.6%). In the subset analysis, cardiac CT showed moderate agreement with Bubble-TTE for PFO detection (κ = 0.41, p < 0.001). During follow-up, ischemic stroke occurred in 49 patients (4.7%), and 116 patients died (11.3%). CT-detected PFO was independently associated with ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.36-4.29, p = 0.003), whereas no significant association was observed with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.50, p = 0.86). In conclusion, CT-detected PFO was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke but not with all-cause mortality, suggesting prognostic relevance for ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueno et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patent foramen ovale (n=1,028). CT-detected patent foramen ovale vs. Absence of CT-detected patent foramen ovale was evaluated on Ischemic stroke (adjusted HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.36-4.29, p=0.003). CT-detected patent foramen ovale was independently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.36-4.29; p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: