Key result
SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA prescription reaches ~42% and ~28% in cardiology outpatients with diabetes.
Why the study?
Implementation of guideline-directed glucose-lowering therapies with proven cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes attending outpatient cardiology clinics was not well characterized.
Observational (n=2,527)
Yes
Despite significant increases in use following the 2023 ESC guidelines, implementation of cardioprotective glucose-lowering therapies (SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA) in high-risk T2DM patients remains suboptimal in Italian outpatient cardiology practice.
Suboptimal SGLT2i/GLP-1RA prescribing persists post-2023 ESC guidelines; leaves open effective strategies to close implementation gaps in cardiology practice.
BACKGROUND: To assess the implementation of guideline-directed glucose-lowering therapies with proven cardiovascular (CV) benefit in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attending Italian outpatient cardiology clinics. METHODS: CardioMET is a multicenter, real-world registry including 2527 consecutive patients with T2DM enrolled between January 2022 and December 2025. Clinical characteristics, CV risk profile, and prescription rates of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of non-prescription. RESULTS: Overall, 70.7% of patients had established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD), while 86.1% of those without ASCVD were classified at high or very high CV risk. Heart failure (HF) was present in 48.9% of patients with available data. SGLT2i were prescribed in 42.2% and GLP-1 RA in 27.7% of patients, whereas 14.8% received combination therapy. SGLT2i use was higher in patients with ASCVD than in high/very high CV risk no ASCVD patients (45.0%vs. 34.9%; p < 0.001) and in patients with HF, whereas no differences between groups in prescription rates of GLP-1 RA were observed. Prescription of both drug classes significantly increased after publication of 2023 ESC Guidelines (SGLT2i: 54.7% vs. 35.0%; GLP-1 RA: 48.4% vs. 15.8%; both p < 0.001). Older age, female sex (for SGLT2i), and absence of established ASCVD independently predicted non-prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of cardioprotective glucose-lowering therapies remains suboptimal in Italian outpatient cardiology practice, underscoring the need for a multidisciplinary approach integrating recommendations from CV, T2DM, and kidney guidelines to optimize implementation of therapy in patients with T2DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gargiulo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=2,527). Guideline-directed glucose-lowering therapies (SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA) was evaluated on Prescription rates of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). Prescription of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in Italian cardiology outpatients with type 2 diabetes was 42.2% and 27.7% respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: