Sexual motivation plays a crucial role in intimate relationships and overall sexual health. The Sexual Motivation Scale (SexMS), developed by Gravel et al. (2016), assesses multidimensional types of sexual motivation based on self-determination theory. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the SexMS among Iranian married adults. In this cross-sectional methodological study, the original 24-item SexMS was translated into Persian using a standardized forward–backward translation protocol. Face and content validity (CVR, CVI) were evaluated by an expert panel. A total of 394 married adults aged 18–60 years were recruited from health centers in Mashhad, Iran. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and the Persian SexMS. Factorial validity was evaluated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega) and test–retest reliability (two-week interval via Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC]) were also assessed. The Persian SexMS demonstrated satisfactory content validity (CVI = 0.87, CVR = 0.89). In the initial CFA, one item from the Intrinsic Motivation subscale (Item 4) was removed due to a low factor loading (< 0.30). The re-specified six-factor model with 23 items demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data: χ²/df = 2.83, CFI = 0.90, IFI = 0.90, and RMSEA = 0.068 (90% CI: 0.061–0.076). Internal consistency was supported (Cronbach’s α = 0.868, McDonald’s ω = 0.882), and test–retest stability was strong (ICC = 0.87, p < 0.001). Integrated regulation yielded the highest mean score (21.49 ± 5.44), whereas Amotivation scored the lowest (7.14 ± 4.74). The 23-item Persian version of the SexMS demonstrates acceptable factorial validity and reliability, serving as a psychometrically sound instrument for research, assessment, and counseling contexts among Iranian married adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: