Background and objectivesChronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is a leading cause of disability, and its management remains a significant challenge.While non-pharmacological interventions like exercise are recommended, the optimal treatment strategy is unclear.This study compared the effectiveness of a comprehensive, five-modality holistic program (behavior therapy, exercise, nutrition optimization, drugs, and posture training) with a standard two-modality intervention (exercise and drugs) for patients with CNLBP. MethodsThis prospective interventional study included 123 patients with CNLBP.Participants were randomly allocated to either a two-modality intervention (Group 1; n = 60) or a five-modality holistic program (Group 2; n = 63).The primary outcome was the between-group difference in pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS) at the six-month follow-up.Secondary endpoints, including changes in anxiety scores and analysis by pain location, were treated as exploratory. ResultsAfter six months, both groups showed clinical improvement.However, the five-modality group (Group 2) demonstrated statistically significant and superior improvements in pain compared to the two-modality group (Group 1).The between-group difference in mean improvement for the VAS score (3.65 vs. 1.55) was statistically significant (p < 0.001).Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with higher baseline anxiety showed significantly greater improvement with the holistic approach. ConclusionsFindings from the current study support the adoption of a holistic, multidisciplinary strategy for the management of CNLBP.The integration of behavior therapy, nutrition optimization, and posture training alongside conventional exercise and medication provides a superior, long-term therapeutic approach.A comprehensive, five-modality treatment program is significantly more effective than a standard twomodality intervention for improving pain in patients with chronic nonspecific spinal pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koshti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: