OBJECTIVE: To analyze the care network for individuals with orofacial pain (OFP) and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS: Oral health managers and primary health care (PHC) dentists completed electronic questionnaires addressing service availability, clinical practices, knowledge-related items, and referral services for TMD and OFP. Data were statistically analyzed at a significance level of 5% (p < .05). RESULTS: Most managers reported that neither PHC (n = 82; 85.4%) nor secondary care (n = 68; 70.8%) treats patients with TMD. Most dentists reported not treating TMD patients (n = 209; 56.3%) and being unaware of public referral services (n = 268; 72.2%). Dentists' responses differed from evidence-based recommendations on TMD etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Specialist status was associated with more evidence-consistent responses, particularly regarding traditional occlusal concepts. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest challenges in organizing TMD/OFP care within SUS, particularly regarding service availability, alignment of dentists' responses with current evidence, and awareness of referral pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: