Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Within the Li x La 2/3- x /3 ◻ 1/3−2 x /3 TiO 3 (LLTO) solid electrolytes with perovskite superstructures, the x = 0.125 term was selected as representative of the Li-poor compositions. Two ordered structural models, with Z = 8 formula units per 2 a p × 2 a p × 2 a p unit-cell, were considered for ab initio periodic quantum-mechanical calculations (DFT-B3LYP Hamiltonian, Gaussian-atomic-orbital basis set). Least-energy optimizations showed that model 1, with P 2 mm symmetry, is more stable and agrees with the Cmmm disordered structures of the x = 0.16 and 0.18 terms from experiment. Then the energy of nonequilibrium states with displaced Li positions (“frozen ion” approach) and lowered symmetry was computed, determining mobility paths of the Li + ion within the (001) layers of both models. A one-dimensional [100] pathway with activation barrier of 0.42 eV was found in the 2La+1Li+1◻ layer of model 2, and a two-dimensional one (0.47 eV barrier) in the 1La+1Li+2◻ layer of model 1. Both Li + ion transport mechanisms should operate in the real disordered material. The predicted barriers are discussed and compared with the experimental activation energy of Li-richer terms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. Catti (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: