This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Two-phase fluid displacement in porous media is a key physical process in subsurface energy and environmental engineering, particularly for CO2-enhanced water recovery (EWR) and geological CO2 storage. However, the effects of pore-space heterogeneity and brine salinity on pore-scale displacement dynamics and storage performance remain poorly understood. In this study, high-pressure and high-temperature microfluidic experiments were conducted using three representative porous-media chips at 50 °C and 10 MPa. High-resolution microscopic imaging combined with quantitative image analysis was used to systematically investigate the effects of pore structure and brine salinity on pore-scale CO2-brine displacement behavior and mechanisms. The results show that increasing pore-structure heterogeneity reduces both brine displacement efficiency and CO2 storage performance. The homogeneous structure exhibits a nearly piston-like displacement pattern and achieves the highest displacement efficiency of 81.98%, whereas the heterogeneous and rock structures promote capillary fingering, preferential channeling, and flow bypassing, resulting in lower displacement efficiencies of 63.86%–73.38%. As pore-structure complexity increases from the idealized homogeneous model to the realistic rock structure model, the CO2 storage capacity decreases significantly by 62.59%. Increasing the injection rate from 0.002 to 0.01 ml/min improves the displacement efficiency by approximately 10% across all three pore structures. In addition, increasing brine salinity modifies the interfacial tension and viscosity ratio while decreasing the capillary number, thereby enhancing capillary-dominated fingering and flow bypassing and reducing the displacement efficiency from 72.43% to 63.86%. These findings quantitatively demonstrate the critical roles of pore-space heterogeneity and brine salinity in pore-scale CO2-brine displacement and provide mechanistic insights into CO2 migration and trapping in saline aquifers, with implications for the optimization of CO2-EWR and geological CO2 storage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: