Key result
Redo ablation after index pulsed-field ablation reveals durable PVI in only ~24% of patients.
Why the study?
Lesion durability after pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing redo ablation remains incompletely characterized.
Cohort (n=25)
No
In patients returning for redo ablation after index pulsed-field ablation, pulmonary vein and posterior wall reconnections are common but can be safely and acutely re-isolated.
Reconnection patterns after PFA inform redo mapping; leaves durability questions open pending prospective trials.
Background Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation, but lesion durability in patients returning for redo ablation remains incompletely characterized. Objective We sought to characterize pulmonary vein (PV) and non-PV reconnection patterns and procedural outcomes in patients undergoing redo ablation after index PFA. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of adults undergoing redo left atrial ablation for recurrent atrial arrhythmia after index PFA between July 2024 and February 2026. Lesion durability was assessed using electroanatomic mapping. The primary outcome was durable PVI at the patient level and PV reconnection at the vein level. Results Among 887 patients who underwent index PFA, 25 underwent redo ablation. Durable PVI was observed in 6 patients (24%), whereas 19 (76%) had reconnection of at least 1 PV. Overall, 42 of 96 PVs (43.5%) demonstrated reconnection. Reconnection was most frequent in the left inferior PV (54.6%) and right superior PV (54.2%) and least frequent in the right inferior PV (29.2%). Posterior wall reconnection was observed in 19 of 22 patients (86.4%). Acute re-isolation was achieved in 24 patients (96%) without complications. Conclusion In this redo-selected cohort after index PFA, PV and non-PV reconnection were common, particularly involving posterior wall isolation. Redo ablation was feasible, with high acute success and no procedural complications. Larger prospective studies are needed to define lesion durability across PFA platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itaya et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=25). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) was evaluated on Durable PVI at the patient level and PV reconnection at the vein level. In patients undergoing redo ablation after index pulsed-field ablation, durable pulmonary vein isolation was seen in 24%, while 76% had reconnection of at least one pulmonary vein.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: