Key result
PHASE Index improves 10-year heart failure risk discrimination over BNP alone in Stage B HF.
Why the study?
BNP levels of 35–100 pg/mL in preclinical HF are associated with heterogeneous prognosis influenced by age and renal function, necessitating improved risk stratification.
Does the PHASE Index improve prediction of 10-year HF-related events compared with BNP alone in patients with preclinical HF and BNP levels of 35-100 pg/mL?
Cohort (n=4,074)
Yes
Does the PHASE Index improve prediction of 10-year HF-related events compared with BNP alone in patients with preclinical HF and BNP levels of 35-100 pg/mL?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The PHASE Index, which incorporates multiple clinical variables, offers significantly better risk stratification than BNP alone for predicting 10-year HF-related events in patients with Stage B heart failure and intermediate BNP levels.
Background B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels of 35–100 pg/mL, common in preclinical heart failure (HF), are associated with heterogeneous prognosis and are influenced by age and renal function. We aimed to characterize risk heterogeneity in preclinical HF patients with BNP levels of 35–100 pg/mL, and to develop a practical risk stratification model. Methods Data from the Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District-2 (CHART-2) Study, a prospective multicenter cohort with long-term follow-up, were analyzed. Among patients with Stage B HF (n = 4,074; age 67.6 ± 12.0 years), the predictability of BNP for 10-year HF-related events was evaluated across strata of age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In patients with BNP levels of 35–100 pg/mL, a composite risk score—the Pre-Heart Failure Assessment and Screening Evaluation (PHASE) Index—was developed using classification and regression tree analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results BNP discrimination varied significantly by age and eGFR (p < 0.05), indicating that a single BNP threshold is insufficient for risk stratification in preclinical HF. The PHASE Index, incorporating age, BNP, eGFR, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, and hypertension, stratified patients with BNP levels of 35–100 pg/mL into four categories and demonstrated superior discrimination compared with BNP alone (c-index 0.723 vs. 0.587, p < 0.05). Conclusions Patients with preclinical HF and BNP levels of 35–100 pg/mL exhibit substantial risk heterogeneity. The PHASE Index improves identification of high-risk individuals and provides a pragmatic tool for risk stratification beyond the conventional BNP threshold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahama et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Stage B Heart Failure (n=4,074). PHASE Index vs. BNP alone was evaluated on Discrimination for 10-year HF-related events (c-index 0.723 vs. 0.587, p=<0.05). The PHASE Index demonstrated superior discrimination for 10-year HF-related events compared with BNP alone (c-index 0.723 vs. 0.587, p<0.05) in patients with Stage B heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: