Key result
Mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis is linked to ~0% long-term mortality.
Why the study?
Long-term results and surgical techniques of mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis were not well described.
Does mitral valve repair provide satisfactory long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis?
Cohort (n=76)
Does mitral valve repair provide satisfactory long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis?
Mitral valve repair is a feasible surgical strategy that provides satisfactory early and long-term outcomes with low mortality and low reoperation rates in patients with infective endocarditis.
Supports mitral valve repair consideration in selected endocarditis; extends observational data but leaves randomized comparisons open.
Objective. To describe surgical technique and long-term results of mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis. Material and methods. Between 2008 and 2024, 76 surgeries were performed for infective endocarditis. Mean age of patients was 41±16 years; 47 (61%) patients had active endocarditis. Positive hemoculture was obtained in 28 (37%) cases. All patients had severe mitral regurgitation. Lesion of posterior mitral leaflet was detected in 45 cases, anterior mitral leaflet — in 14 cases, bicuspid lesion in 11 and commissural lesions in 6 cases. Multicomponent reconstructions were performed in 23 patients (simultaneous resections, patches, neochordae), resections — in 20 cases, implantation of pericardial patches — in 14 patients. Suturing of marginal ruptures and small abscesses of valves was performed in 16 patients. In 3 patients, resection of vegetation on mitral chords was followed by implantation of neochordae. All patients underwent annuloplasty. Intraoperative TEE did not reveal severe regurgitation. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 135±56 min, aortic cross-clamping time — 77±22 min. Results. There was 1 postoperative death from acute heart failure. Other patients were discharged with satisfactory MV function. Long-term results were evaluated in 60 (80%) patients. Mid-term postoperative mortality was 3% (2 patients died after 1 and 36 months from non-cardiac causes). All patients had no recurrence of endocarditis and stroke. According to TTE data, severe insufficiency was noted in 2 patients (MV replacement was performed after 1 and 3 years). In other cases, regurgitation was trivial. Thirty-six patients achieved long-term follow-up (74±39 months). There was no long-term mortality. Seven patients had moderate regurgitation, 2 patients — severe mitral insufficiency. One patient underwent MV replacement after 132 months. Other patients had no severe mitral regurgitation or stenosis. Conclusion. MV repair is feasible and provides satisfactory early and long-term results in patients with infective endocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khramchenkov et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in infective endocarditis (n=76). Mitral valve repair was evaluated. Mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis was associated with 1 postoperative death among 76 patients and 0% long-term mortality over a mean follow-up of 74 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: