Key result
Left main CAD shows similar 3D GLS reductions and no distinct strain patterns versus non-LM CAD.
Why the study?
Noninvasive detection of left main coronary artery disease in stable ischemic heart disease with good LV function and no regional wall motion abnormalities is challenging and understudied using 3D strain echocardiography.
Does left main disease compared to non-left main disease present with a specific 3D echocardiographic strain pattern in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, good LV function, and no regional wall motion abnormalities?
Cross-Sectional (n=76)
No
Does left main disease compared to non-left main disease present with a specific 3D echocardiographic strain pattern in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, good LV function, and no regional wall motion abnormalities?
Absolute Event Rate: -12.6% vs -13.8%
In patients with stable ischemic heart disease without regional wall motion abnormalities and with good LV function, 3D strain parameters are reduced, but they do not differentiate left main from non-left main coronary disease.
3D strain reductions occur similarly without left main-specific patterns in stable IHD without wall motion abnormalities; leaves open utility for noninvasive differentiation.
Background: Noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in left main (LM) disease or three-vessel CAD usually requires a stress test since regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) are not always obvious at rest. Strain is a more sensitive parameter of myocardial systolic function and may be abnormal in patients with severe CAD. Although there are studies on the detection of CAD using strain echo for single-, double-, and triple-vessel disease, LM disease has not been studied to the same extent. Aim and Objective: The objective of the study was to obtain the three-dimensional (3D) strain of patients of CAD with LM Vessel Disease versus Non-LM disease in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) with good left ventricular (LV) function and no RWMA and to correlate the 3D strain for any specific pattern. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, from January 2024 to December 2024, among patients aged >18 years with SIHD. Around 700 SIHD patients were screened; of these, 76 were enrolled in the study, underwent coronary angiography, and were divided into two groups: LM disease versus non-LM disease. 3D strain Echo was performed in both groups, and the results in CAD with LM disease versus non-LM disease were compared for any specific 3D strain pattern. Results: Among the 76 enrolled patients, the majority were male, aged 51–60 years. The most common presenting symptom was effort angina, and comorbidities were systemic hypertension, followed by diabetes mellitus. The mean Global strain of both LM and Non-LM groups was grossly reduced. The mean 3D global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global area strain (GAS), and global radial strain (GRS) of the LM group versus the Non-LM group were −12.6 versus − 13.8, −13.2 versus − 13.0, −22.0 versus −22.7, and + 35.2 versus + 34.1, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with SIHD with no RWMA and good LV function have definite reductions in 3D strain in terms of GLS, GCS, GAS, and GRS in both LM and non-LM groups. The segmental analysis of GLS could not differentiate any specific strain pattern between them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanthaswamy et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable ischemic heart disease with good left ventricular function and no regional wall motion abnormality (n=76). Left main (LM) disease vs. Non-left main (Non-LM) disease was evaluated on 3D global longitudinal strain (GLS). Left main disease compared to non-left main disease showed similar reductions in 3D global longitudinal strain (-12.6 vs -13.8), with no specific segmental strain pattern differentiating the groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: