Key result
Higher caregiver self-efficacy is linked to better caregiver-assisted self-care across all coronary disease domains.
Why the study?
Self-care is suboptimal in many coronary heart disease patients, and the mechanisms underlying variability in caregiver contribution to self-care are not fully understood.
Cross-Sectional (n=155)
Effect estimate: β = 0.34-0.51
p-value: p=<.001
Caregiver self-efficacy is a significant mediator of caregiver contribution to self-care in coronary heart disease, highlighting it as a potential target for interventions to improve patient self-care support.
May inform caregiver interventions in coronary heart disease; leaves open causal effects on patient self-care outcomes.
Background: Self-care is a determinant of long-term outcomes in coronary heart disease, yet it remains suboptimal in many patients. Informal caregivers support patient self-care, but the mechanisms underlying variability in caregiver contribution (CC) are not fully understood. This study examined whether caregiver self-efficacy mediates the association between caregiver characteristics and CC to self-care across the domains of self-care maintenance, self-care monitoring, and self-care management. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed baseline data from 155 informal caregivers enrolled in the Italian HEARTS-IN-DYADS study. Caregiver contribution to self-care was measured using the CC to Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory, and self-efficacy using the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Self-Care scale. Structural equation models were estimated separately for each CC to self-care domain, with self-efficacy specified as a mediator. Results: The CC scores were below the adequacy threshold across all domains, whereas self-efficacy scores were adequate. All models demonstrated excellent fit. Caregiver self-efficacy was a consistent predictor of CC across all domains (β = 0.34–0.51, P < .001). Indirect effects via self-efficacy were observed for occupation, education, and caregiving hours. Direct effects emerged primarily in the monitoring domain, where age, education, financial adequacy, and caregiving hours were associated with CC. The models explained 17%–33% of the variance in CC and 10% in self-efficacy. Conclusions: Caregiver self-efficacy is a key factor associated with CC to self-care in coronary heart disease and may represent a potential target for interventions aimed at improving caregiver involvement in patient self-care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matteo et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary Heart Disease (n=155). Caregiver self-efficacy and characteristics was evaluated on Caregiver contribution to self-care (maintenance, monitoring, and management domains) (β = 0.34-0.51, p=<.001). Caregiver self-efficacy was a consistent predictor of caregiver contribution to self-care across all domains in coronary heart disease (β = 0.34-0.51, P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: