Key result
Specialist-led care in the community increased the initiation or dose up-titration of CKMP pharmacological therapies compared to usual care (61.8% vs 22.9%; OR 5.4; 95% CI 2.5-12.3; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Community-dwelling high risk individuals may not receive all eligible pharmacological treatments for cardiovascular, kidney, metabolic, and pulmonary risk factors from non-specialists.
Does specialist-led community-based care increase the initiation or dose-escalation of guideline-directed cardio-kidney-metabolic-pulmonary pharmacological therapies in high-risk community-dwelling adults compared to usual care?
RCT (n=138)
Open-label, blinded endpoint
1:1
Yes
Does specialist-led community-based care increase the initiation or dose-escalation of guideline-directed cardio-kidney-metabolic-pulmonary pharmacological therapies in high-risk community-dwelling adults compared to usual care?
Community-based specialist-led care significantly increased the initiation and up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for cardio-kidney-metabolic-pulmonary risk factors compared to usual primary care.
Background and Aims Pharmacological therapies that treat cardiovascular, kidney, metabolic and pulmonary (CKMP) risk factors reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but community-dwelling individuals may not receive all treatments to which they are eligible from non-specialists. This trial investigated if specialist-led care in the community increases the utilisation of CKMP pharmacological interventions compared with usual care. Methods This pragmatic prospective randomised open label blinded endpoint trial included community-dwelling high risk adults aged ≥30 years from 15 primary care sites in England. Participants were randomised 1:1 to an intervention of two clinic appointments (at baseline and approximately 3 months) with a cardiology specialist at their primary care site to review and optimise CKMP risk factors in accordance with UK guidelines, or usual care. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with initiation and/or increase in the dose of guideline-directed CKMP pharmacological therapies at 6 months after date of randomisation. Results Between March 2025 and July 2025, 138 participants were randomised (68 intervention, 70 control); the median age was 76.6 years, 52.9% were women. At 6 months after randomisation, in the intervention arm 42 of 68 (61.8%) patients received a CKMP pharmacological intervention compared with 16 of 70 patients (22.9%) in the control arm (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 2.5 to 12.3, p < 0.0001, absolute risk difference 38.9%, 95% CI 23.7% to 54.1%). Conclusions Specialist-led care in the community for high risk individuals increased the use of pharmacological interventions for CKMP risk factors compared to usual care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadarajah et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in High cardiovascular, kidney, metabolic and pulmonary risk (n=138). Specialist-led care in the community vs. Usual care was evaluated on Proportion of participants with initiation and/or increase in the dose of guideline-directed CKMP pharmacological therapies at 6 months (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.5 to 12.3, p=< 0.0001). Specialist-led care in the community increased the initiation or dose up-titration of CKMP pharmacological therapies compared to usual care (61.8% vs 22.9%; OR 5.4; 95% CI 2.5-12.3; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: