Key result
Troponin-only ordering for acute ischemic heart disease rises marginally to just ~5% nationwide over 14 years.
Why the study?
International guidelines consider CK-MB and myoglobin to be of limited value for diagnosing AMI, but how to target and monitor cardiac biomarker stewardship remains unclear.
Observational (n=1,399,505)
Yes
Despite international guidelines recommending troponin-only testing for acute myocardial infarction, CK-MB co-ordering remains highly prevalent in real-world practice, highlighting the need for targeted institutional diagnostic stewardship.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Persistent low-value CK-MB co-ordering supports targeted stewardship; leaves open drivers of guideline nonadherence in acute ischemic heart disease.
International guidelines consider CK-MB and myoglobin to be of low or limited value for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but how to target and monitor cardiac biomarker stewardship remains unclear. Using Korean nationwide single-payer claims (2010–2024), we analyzed the earliest claim per patient with acute ischemic heart disease (AIHD) and at least one cardiac biomarker order (CK-MB, myoglobin, or troponin), computing troponin-only ordering rates by AMI status, institution type, region, and department. The troponin-only rate remained between 3% and 4% through 2020 and reached 5.27% in 2024 (15-year average 3.9%). In claims-defined AMI, it was 0.4–0.8% each year and did not change despite guideline updates, compared with 3.8–7.2% in non-AMI AIHD. Tertiary and general hospitals accounted for about 97% of claims; the rate rose from 2.4% to 6.4% in tertiary hospitals but changed little in general hospitals (4.0% in 2010 and 4.7% in 2024). Pooled departmental rates were 3.3% in cardiology, 6.9% in general internal medicine, and 2.6% in emergency medicine. Despite consistent international guidelines, CK-MB co-ordering persisted across all major departments and nearly every claims-defined AMI claim. We identify tertiary hospitals and high-volume departments as priority stewardship targets, and propose the troponin-only ordering rate stratified by institution and department as a transferable population-scale monitoring indicator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic heart disease (AIHD) (n=1,399,505). Calendar year (2010-2024) vs. 2010 baseline was evaluated on Troponin-only ordering rate in first AIHD claims (AAPC 3.1%, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.6). The nationwide troponin-only ordering rate for acute ischemic heart disease remained low, increasing only marginally from 4.12% in 2010 to 5.27% in 2024, demonstrating persistent low-value CK-MB co-ordering despite updated guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: