Cohort study reveals cumulative LDL cholesterol burden and variability jointly increase cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes, indicating the need for stable lipid control.
AIMS: To assess whether threshold-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) burden and visit-to-visit variability jointly stratify cardiovascular and mortality risk in adults with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 258 183 Korean adults with T2DM who underwent National Health Insurance Service health screening in 2015-2016. LDL-C burden was defined as the number of measurements ≥ 130 mg/dL across four examinations (0-4), and variability was assessed using average successive variability (Q4 vs. Q1-Q3). Outcomes through 2022 were incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models. RESULTS: During a median 7.14 years, composite CVD occurred in 10 886 participants. Incidence was 6.22 versus 6.62 per 1000 person-years in participants with 0 versus 4 LDL-C elevation episodes; adjusted HRs increased from 1.10 (95% CI 1.04-1.15) to 1.49 (1.39-1.60). The association was stronger for MI (HR 1.66, 1.52-1.82) than for stroke (HR 1.32, 1.20-1.46). High variability modestly increased CVD risk overall (HR 1.09, 1.05-1.14), but in the four-episode group, Q4 had a higher event rate than Q1-Q3 (7.49 vs. 6.47 per 1000 person-years). Cardiovascular mortality risk was elevated only at the highest burden (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.21-1.81) and increased further with concurrent Q4 variability (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.53-4.00). All-cause mortality was inversely associated overall, but this pattern was modified by high variability, particularly in younger adults or longer-duration diabetes subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM, LDL-C burden and variability jointly identified patients at greater risk, especially for MI and cardiovascular mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: