Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The phase formation in binary Cu–30 at.%Zn//Cu–80 at.%Zn diffusion couples annealed at 565°C is investigated by means of electron backscatter diffraction and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. Growth kinetics and crystallographic relationships of the forming intermetallic compound phases are characterized in detail. The growth rates of all forming phases follow a parabolic growth law even down to annealing times of only 27 s, verifying diffusion-controlled growth for the early stages. About 37% of the analyzed α/β interfaces were found to display near Kurdjumov-Sachs orientation relationships (misorientations > 5°), which predominantly corresponded more accurately to Bain or Nishiyama-Wassermann relationships (misorientations < 5°). Almost 60% of the investigated β/γ phase boundaries exhibit a cube-on-cube relationship. The δ phase, which is only stable above 560°C, undergoes an eutectoid decomposition during quenching, forming a lamellar structure of γ and ε phase. Almost all eutectoid ε has the same orientations as the initial adjoining ε grains. A considerable fraction of the eutectoid γ phase is oriented to the eutectoid ε phase according to the Potter and Burgers relationships. The solubilities of the Zn-rich phases δ and ε at 565°C and 580°C were found to exhibit systematically lower Zn concentrations than predicted by thermodynamic descriptions from literature and assessed Cu–Zn phase diagrams available in literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Möbius et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: