Key result
Exercise training yields meaningful peak VO2 improvements in only ~19% of cardiovascular disease patients.
Why the study?
Reliable change indices can determine individual-level pre-post intervention changes greater than chance or practice effect in cardiovascular disease exercise training but have not been applied systematically.
Does 6-months of guideline-recommended aerobic exercise training improve oxygen uptake parameters in cardiovascular disease patients at the individual level?
Cohort (n=303)
Does 6-months of guideline-recommended aerobic exercise training improve oxygen uptake parameters in cardiovascular disease patients at the individual level?
Applying reliable change indices indicates that most cardiovascular disease patients do not achieve statistically reliable, individual-level improvements in oxygen uptake parameters after 6 months of guideline-recommended exercise training.
Few CVD patients achieve reliable individual VO2 gains from guideline exercise; hypothesis-generating for personalized regimens in prospective trials.
Background Reliable change indices can determine pre-post intervention changes at an individual level that are greater than chance or practice effect. We applied previously developed minimal meaningful change (MMC RCI ) scores for oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 ) values associated with estimated lactate threshold (θ LT ), respiratory compensation point (RCP), and peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ) to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise training in cardiovascular disease patients. Methods 303 patients (65 ± 11 yrs.; 27% female) that completed a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) before and after 6-months of guideline-recommended exercise training were assessed to determine absolute and relative V̇O 2 at θ LT , RCP, and V̇O 2peak . Using MMC RCI ∆V̇O 2 scores of ±3.9 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 , ±4.0 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 , and ± 3.6 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 for θ LT , RCP, and V̇O 2peak , respectively, patients were classified as "positive" (Δθ LT , ΔRCP, and/or ΔV̇O 2peak ≥ +MMC RCI ), "non-" (between ±MMC RCI ), or "negative" responders (≤ -MMC RCI ). Results Mean RCP ( n = 86) and V̇O 2peak ( n = 303) increased ( p < 0.05) from 19.4 ± 3.6 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 and 18.0 ± 6.3 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 to 20.1 ± 3.8 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 and 19.2 ± 7.0 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 at exit, respectively, whereas θ LT ( n = 140) did not change (15.5 ± 3.4 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 versus 15.7 ± 3.8 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 , p = 0.324). For changes in θ LT , 6% were classified as "positive" responders, 90% as "non-responders", and 4% as "negative" responders. For RCP, 10% exhibited "positive" changes, 87% were "non-responders", and 2% were "negative" responders. For ΔV̇O 2peak , 57 patients (19%) were classified as "positive" responders, 229 (76%) as "non-responders", and 17 (6%) as "negative" responders. Conclusion Most patients that completed the exercise training program did not achieve reliable improvements greater than that of chance or practice at an individual level in θ LT , RCP and V̇O 2peak .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keltz et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in cardiovascular disease (n=303). Guideline-recommended exercise training vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on Changes in oxygen uptake (V̇O2) at estimated lactate threshold, respiratory compensation point, and peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak). After 6 months of exercise training, only 19% of cardiovascular disease patients achieved reliable individual-level improvements in peak oxygen uptake greater than chance or practice effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: